Sunday, October 7, 2012
Soon and very soon
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Libertarian?
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Sense of wonder
So I was thinking the other day why I don't really enjoy most of the scifi or fantasy (in book, game, or movie form) that's come out recently, and I came to the conclusion that most modern fiction is missing a sense of wonder.
Let's define that: wonder is something that makes your soul ache for what might have been, what never was, and what may yet be.
Since that's not a really useful definition, I'm going to try and elaborate. Wonder comes from the unknown, being faced with it and exploring it, and most importantly with being left with unanswered questions. It's also a positive emotion, so the unknown must awe, it must inspire, it must grant possibilities undreamt-of.
However most speculative fiction these days doesn't do that. This is the worst in movies, but much scifi is in fact horror, where whatever unknown there is, is not something to be explored but hidden from or destroyed. Fantasy falls into "gritty and realistic" (GRR Martin), Urban Fantasy (Every fantasy book published for the past five years it seems), or A Clone Of The Lord Of The Rings.
While the first one fails the wonder test on the simple merit of striving as hard as it can in the opposite direction, the latter two make an egregious error in storytelling, to my mind. They have no original setting.
Urban fantasy comes with a big asterisk saying "Like Reality Unless Otherwise Noted." And how many fantasy settings are just Generic Medieval England or bog-standard Middle-Earth, with orcs and goblins and dwarfs and elves? This is familiar, it inspires not the imagination, and it's incredibly lazy.
You can't explore the unknown if you don't give the reader an unknown to confront. And the only way you can do that is to invent your own universe. In scifi, that used to be by inventing everything outside the Earth, but these days it seems everyone has the same Generic Interstellar Government Of Earth, sometimes with a vague threat or another. There's no outside context problem to confront, no immensity of concept, it's just regular wars and politics writ slightly larger and with starships instead of tanks.
So there's one fundamental thing people need to do when they write - forget reality. Stories are not reality. Oh, you need verisimilitude of reactions for human characters, but nothing else needs to match our world. Your politics, your wars, your histories, your laws of physics. We have an infinite sandbox to play in, your starships need not be buildable, and your magics explainable. Don't write people being terrible to each other because it's realistic - stories are for inspiring, for creating the reality we want things to be, not just ruminating over the grit and nastiness that plague us.
Thursday, June 21, 2012
New cover is here!
Saturday, June 2, 2012
Where's the community in MMOs?
This is going to be an extraordinarily broad-strokes statement, but it seems pretty accurate.
Every upcoming MMO - and most current ones - seems to be a single-player RPG that more than one person can play.
This is most obvious in terms of story, where the quest lines try to make it seem that the player is The Hero, capital letters intentional. That's the tried-and-true (and logical) architecture of a single-player RPG, but in an MMO each individual is just one of many. Some people may indeed be more important than others, but they become more important in terms of community rather than the scripted storyline (...with a few exceptions I'll touch on later). Groups and guilds are formed in order to take down bosses, but for the most part there seems to be relatively little support for these sorts of communities in the framework of the game. For the lack of a better word, the aspects of multiplayerness in MMOs are out of character attributes, completely ignored by the framework of the game universe.
There are exceptions to this. EVE, for example, uses the community to drive everything and in EVE, corps are a Big Deal. The biggest corps shape the way the game plays for everyone, arguably even more than CCP. And the one that is nearest and dearest to my heart is Asheron's Call. Yes, it's still around after...what, twelve years? It competed with Everquest back in the day, and I think that if the MMO industry had taken more cues from it rather than EQ we would have been much better off.
Ignoring a completely original setting (come on, how many games need to have elves and orcs and goblins?), AC is one of the few MMOs that actually, in-game, addresses the fact that players have infinite lives, that there are thousands of them, that they can /whisper each other. It had a unique guild system that encouraged more experienced players to mentor newer ones. It had an ongoing storyline that continues to this day. Monthly updates, people. But even though it isn't as community-driven as EVE, it did a few unusual things by including the actions of players in its storyline. It's very hard to top The Defense Of Thistledown in terms of MMO awesomeness.
Let's compare this to the MMO that I've played on and off for five plus years - WoW. In WoW, the player is no longer even in the storyline. Thrall and the Dragon Aspects do all the work. People blame dungeon finder and LFR for the dissolution of "community" but there never really was one. Part of that might be sheer numbers - 10 million people is a lot. But I was there from the beginning, from the closed beta for Vanilla, and the problem started then. Blizzard made no attempt to shape that small a community, and the nucleus of seething contentiousness that was the Closed Beta testers informed the wider community as WoW was released and grew. They've also maintained a distance between themselves and players that, while it might make sense for a single player game company, only frustrates people who continually consume content.
Let's compare this to The Old Republic. Marvelous single player storyline that drives you to a certain level and then...stops. What's the point? If you're going to script the story of an individual within the world, use a single player game.
You need a different kind of storytelling for an MMO, a sort of universe-building, group-oriented storytelling. You need to acknowledge the efforts of players themselves, whether it's a company going in and changing an asset in honor of someone, or an automated way of players making a mark on the world. You also need to give them communities, and not just a guild channel. We have many, many templates for social networking, so how hard would it be to build one into an MMO's interface? It's not like people don't like being in communities, it's just that if the cost is too high (they have to go somewhere outside the game) it's just not going to happen. I think WoW has lasted as long as it has because it's frankly the most polished and best-feeling MMO to play that's out there. But I don't think it's a good model for the future. For that, you should look to the past.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Used Games
Monday, July 26, 2010
Books and books and more books.
Foreigner
Invader
Inheritor
Trilogy arc 2
Precursor
Defender
Explorer
Trilogy arc 3
Destroyer
Pretender
Deliverer
Trilogy arc 4
Conspirator
Deceiver
- On Basilisk Station (April 1992) ISBN 0-671-57793-X
- The Honor of the Queen (June 1993) ISBN 0-671-57864-2
- The Short Victorious War (April 1994) ISBN 0-671-87596-5
- Field of Dishonor (December 1994) ISBN 0-671-57820-0
- Flag in Exile (September 1995) ISBN 0-671-31980-9
- Honor Among Enemies (February 1996) ISBN 0-671-87723-2
- In Enemy Hands (July 1997) ISBN 0-671-57770-0
- Echoes of Honor (October 1998) ISBN 0-671-57833-2
- Ashes of Victory (March 2000) ISBN 0-671-57854-5
- War of Honor (October 2002) ISBN 0-7434-3545-1
- At All Costs (November 2005) ISBN 1-4165-0911-9
- Mission of Honor (June 2010) ISBN 1-4391-3361-1
1 | The Colour of Magic | 1983 | Rincewind | Came 93rd in the Big Read. |
2 | The Light Fantastic | 1986 | Rincewind | |
3 | Equal Rites | 1987 | The Witches, The Wizards | |
4 | Mort | 1987 | Death | Came 65th in the Big Read |
5 | Sourcery | 1988 | Rincewind, The Wizards | |
6 | Wyrd Sisters | 1988 | The Witches | Came 135th in the Big Read |
7 | Pyramids | 1989 | Miscellaneous (Djelibeybi) | British Science Fiction Award winner, 1989[5] |
8 | Guards! Guards! | 1989 | The City Watch | Came 69th in the Big Read |
9 | 1990 | Rincewind | ||
10 | Moving Pictures | 1990 | Miscellaneous (Holy Wood), The Wizards | |
11 | Reaper Man | 1991 | Death, The Wizards | Came 126th in the Big Read |
12 | Witches Abroad | 1991 | The Witches | Came 197th in the Big Read |
13 | Small Gods | 1992 | Miscellaneous (Omnia), The History Monks | Came 102nd in the Big Read |
14 | Lords and Ladies | 1992 | The Witches, The Wizards | |
15 | Men at Arms | 1993 | The City Watch | Came 148th in the Big Read |
16 | Soul Music | 1994 | Death, Susan Sto Helit, The Wizards | Came 151st in the Big Read |
17 | Interesting Times | 1994 | Rincewind, The Wizards | |
18 | Maskerade | 1995 | The Witches | |
19 | Feet of Clay | 1996 | The City Watch | |
20 | Hogfather | 1996 | Death, Susan Sto Helit, The Wizards | Came 137th in the Big Read; British Fantasy Award nominee, 1997[6] |
21 | Jingo | 1997 | The City Watch | |
22 | The Last Continent | 1998 | Rincewind, The Wizards | |
23 | Carpe Jugulum | 1998 | The Witches | |
24 | The Fifth Elephant | 1999 | The City Watch | Came 153rd in the Big Read; Locus Fantasy Award nominee, 2000[7] |
25 | The Truth | 2000 | The Ankh-Morpork Times, The City Watch | Came 193rd in the Big Read |
26 | Thief of Time | 2001 | Death, Susan Sto Helit, The History Monks | Came 152nd in the Big Read; Locus Award nominee, 2002[8] |
27 | The Last Hero | 2001 | Rincewind, The Wizards, The City Watch | Published in a larger format and fully illustrated by Paul Kidby |
28 | The Amazing Maurice and his Educated Rodents | 2001 | Miscellaneous (Ãœberwald) | A YA (young adult or children's) Discworld book; winner of the 2001 Carnegie Medal |
29 | Night Watch | 2002 | The City Watch, The History Monks | Received the Prometheus Award in 2003; came 73rd in the Big Read; Locus Award nominee, 2003[9] |
30 | The Wee Free Men | 2003 | Tiffany Aching | The second YA Discworld book |
31 | Monstrous Regiment | 2003 | Miscellaneous (Borogravia), The City Watch, The Ankh-Morpork Times | The title is a reference to The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women[10] |
32 | A Hat Full of Sky | 2004 | Tiffany Aching, The Witches | The third YA Discworld book |
33 | Going Postal | 2004 | Moist von Lipwig | Locus and Nebula Awards nominee, 2005[11] |
34 | Thud! | 2005 | The City Watch | Locus Award nominee, 2006[12] |
35 | Wintersmith | 2006 | Tiffany Aching, The Witches | The fourth YA book. |
36 | Making Money | 2007 | Moist von Lipwig | Locus Award winner, Nebula nominee, 2008[13] |
37 | Unseen Academicals | 2009[14] | The Wizards, Miscellaneous (Nutt) | |
38 | I Shall Wear Midnight[15] | 2010 | Tiffany Aching | Fifth YA book |
The Books of the North
- The Black Company - May 1984
- Shadows Linger - October 1984
- The White Rose - April 1985
[edit]The Books of the South
- Shadow Games - June 1989
- Dreams of Steel - April 1990
[edit]The Books of the Glittering Stone
- Bleak Seasons - April 1996
- She Is the Darkness - September 1997
- Water Sleeps - March 1999
- Soldiers Live - July 2000
- God Stalk, 1982 (ISBN 978-0425060797)
- Dark of the Moon, 1985 (ISBN 978-0689311710)
- Seeker's Mask, 1994 (ISBN 978-0739418871)
- To Ride a Rathorn, August 2006 (ISBN 978-1592221028)
- Bound In Blood, March 2010 (ISBN 978-1439133408)
- The Lies of Locke Lamora (June 2006)
- Red Seas Under Red Skies (July 2007)
- The Republic of Thieves (forthcoming)
- Servant of the Underworld
- Harbinger of the Storm